Return to self-nomination Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	conways
Date/Time:	Mon, May 29, 2000 at 3:18 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Self Nominating Rules
Message:
I feel that the 10% threshold for self nomination is to high.  I feel a modest but reasonable level of support is 100 people. I see no reason to publish supporters.  The information on the nominee will indicate potential conflicts of interest. I prefer the term "member-nominated" Why have a nominating committee at all and who appoints them?  Member nominations appear to be more consistant with the intent of Members at Large.  I recommend that the nominating committee approach be dropped or that the details of potential conflicts of interest and background on the nominating committee be published.

Message Thread:

• Welcome -- comments invited — amclaughlin, May 19 @ 6:36 PM (4/11)
• Self Nominating Rules — conways, May 29 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)
• 1000 Word Essay — the-butterfly-guy, May 27 @ 6:55 PM (1/1)
• Yes fine... — BlueBit, June 2 @ 2:40 PM (0/0)
• minimal support level — gburton, May 20 @ 5:51 AM (1/1)
• Number of self-nominated candidates on final ballot — shugal, May 24 @ 2:26 PM (0/0)
• Conditions 4 and 9b — gregcrew, May 20 @ 1:00 AM (5/5)
• Email address confidentiality — ddimick, May 31 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
• privacy and regional restrictions — meyns, May 27 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
• Email Addresses — jandl, May 24 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
• email addresses — gburton, May 23 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
• Re: Conditions 4 and 9b — pchitescu, May 23 @ 11:39 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy