Return to self-nomination Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	johnwerneken
Date/Time:	Sun, June 11, 2000 at 5:27 AM GMT (Sat, June 10, 2000 at 10:27 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	who cares about California's laws
Message:
It is hard to image what the relevance of some local corporate regulations in the state of california might be to the governance of an international institution. Any organization like this - large in scope, built by committed voluteers - is going to end up with an initial "official governing membership" much like the original leadership. The US FEderal Government was that way too in the beginning. I say let the Board get organized, get down to business, and begin to demonstrate the relevance of the new ICANN to the real world. Time enough later for factions to form and electioneering to occur.

Message Thread:

• Nomination Process Comment / Cal. Corp. Code Sec. 5110 et seq. — Bret Fausett, June 6 @ 4:52 AM (3/8)
• who cares about California's laws — johnwerneken, June 11 @ 5:27 AM (1/2)
• who cares? — gburton, June 11 @ 3:41 PM (1/1)
• That's a moderately serious mistake — dank, July 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
• Why require ANY threshold of support? — weisberg, June 6 @ 1:24 PM (2/2)
• inbox — francis, June 16 @ 1:53 PM (0/0)
• Why require ANY threshold of support? — chuckg, June 15 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)
• A legible version — Bret Fausett, June 6 @ 4:53 AM (1/1)
• 10% is still too high — GreggCercy, June 10 @ 4:35 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy