Return to self-nomination Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	winnetou
Date/Time:	Fri, June 30, 2000 at 8:43 PM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.7 using XWindows/Linux 2.2.16 (Pentium)
Score:	5
Subject:	self-nomination
Message:
> Though I disagree about "self-nominated" being prejudicial (it's > just plain accurate, in my view) Perhaps it is the language barrier, but it sounds prejudicial to me too.  Only during the first stage is an independent candidate self-nominated; after the candidate gathered support from members from at least two states, the candidate is member-nominated. It would be perhaps be more accurate to clearly show who supported the candidates by calling them member-nominated vs. committee-nominated.

Message Thread:

• Egregious flaws in Proposed Rules for Self-Nomination — dblake, May 31 @ 6:42 AM (3/7)
• Some questions — Andrew McLaughlin, June 5 @ 3:49 AM (4/4)
• self-nomination — winnetou, June 30 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)
• I disagree with Andrew McLaughlin's response to point (2) — smithco, June 28 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)
• Nomination process and campaigning — dltallan, June 20 @ 1:35 PM (0/0)
• tsk tsk — mueller, June 6 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
• I agree! — Ling, June 2 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)
• Thank you — reedpc, May 31 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy