Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
peniel |
| Date/Time: |
Wed, October 25, 2000 at 11:02 PM GMT |
| Browser: |
AOL Browser V5.0 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
Single TLD extension proposals |
Message: |
|
Single TLD extension proposals: There is a delicate balance: 1) on the one hand,
registrars or zone file licensees cannot remain profitable if they are forced to
access too many registries [technologically & financially it would place a tremendous
burden on current registrars needing to access numerous registry databases in order
to offer the new TLDs to their existing customers & thus, stay competitive], and
2) on the other hand, we have the example of Network Solutions and see the abuses
of power that are the result of concentrating too much control in the hands of one
entity.
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .biz Application by JVTeam, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:29 PM (10/14)
- Critique of JVTeam Application — Phil Berent, October 27 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- Single TLD extension proposals — peniel, October 25 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Charter — PhilBerent, October 24 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
- first use — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)
- .biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
- and MORE CORE and more MONOPOLY and they also want .WEB — jandl, October 19 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- YOU SHOULD KNOW BY NOW.....BIZ ALREADY EXISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT ICANN!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:08 AM (1/4)
- application materials same as biz3? — jandl, October 17 @ 2:33 AM (0/0)
- Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy