Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
roykess |
Date/Time: |
Sun, October 29, 2000 at 5:12 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Visual Computing Systems supports .one |
Message: |
|
I am writing to support the application for a new TLD being submittedby Group
One Registry. I have reviewed the proposal and believe it is sound and would
be of substantial benefit to the Internet community and could stimulate the growth
of services available on the Internet that would in turn stimulate invention in many
fields.Visual Computing Systems Corporation and a consortium of partners are developing
a family of intelligent motion control modules for use in a wide range of industrial,
aerospace, commercial, and consumer applications. These modules will allow
robots, machine tools, electric vehicles, aircraft, home appliances and more to be
designed and constructed with great ease. The .one approach will allow these
versatile robotic systems to communicate effectively. This will greatly facilitate
the operation, monitoring and diagnostics of these systems from anywhere in the world. Group
One has an excellent idea to provide an infrastructure that others can use to invent
the machines of tomorrow. This is an exciting proposal! .one will further empower
a world of innovators to make the Internet even more useful and dynamic than it is
today!
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .one Application by Group One Registry, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:09 PM (29/34)
- Is dot One really needed? sking, November 5 @ 9:55 PM (1/1)
- Support for .one FranR, November 5 @ 3:29 AM (1/1)
- Group One Registry SHOULD be supported mouradz, November 3 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)
- me too! mika, November 3 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
- .one strickt, November 3 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)
- Good Proposal catief, November 3 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)
- Support for .one - simple and beneficial rguptill, November 3 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- I support .one jwilson, November 2 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
- Support for (.one) KD, November 2 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)
- Aesbus supports.one jenjen281, November 1 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
- Support for .one bakedon, November 1 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- The Internet needs .one! Havener, November 1 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
- Support for Group One registry (.one) jonsholberg, November 1 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)
- .one cumbow, October 31 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
- .one TLD is a very sound proposal smuller, October 31 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
- Correlation between .one address and phone numbers msedmundw, October 30 @ 11:46 PM (1/1)
- Public safety and .one sellmhi, October 30 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
- Visual Computing Systems supports .one roykess, October 29 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)
- Shockwave Wireless Support for Group One's Registry Proposal thirou, October 28 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
- .One domain. Amin_Ansari, October 27 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
- Go with group one Registry Inc's Proposal hubbard4536, October 27 @ 7:50 AM (0/0)
- Support for Group One Registry Garrettsmith, October 27 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
- The .one TLD lbayles, October 27 @ 2:54 AM (1/1)
- .one rajamedlink, October 26 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)
- Fort Knox / WebVision Relationship cdodder, October 24 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- jGuru supports .one tombu, October 23 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
- .one application by Group One Registry ggoeser, October 22 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- Application posted at www.grouponeregistry.com PKS, October 17 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy