Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
sking |
Date/Time: |
Sun, November 5, 2000 at 9:55 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Is dot One really needed? |
Message: |
|
I see that group one is proposing numeric domain
names, for a fee? Can’t you get all the numeric domain names that you want under
a .com, .net or .org? In addition, the approach of assigning a unique numeric
domain name to each machine would seem to make things more difficult. For eg. why
can’t one domain name be applied to a home residential gateway that networks all
the home devices and allows access via a web-based platform rather than assigning
a unique domain name to each of those devices. Also, the idea of incumbent telcos
registering domain names relating to telephone numbers is frankly not a very useful
idea. What improvement does it bring? Telephone numbers change as you change providers
or move, so then you would be required to change your domain name. Overall, seems
like .one TLD would not be useful allocation of the TLD space. There are better proposals
on the table. Sarah King
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .one Application by Group One Registry, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:09 PM (29/34)
- Is dot One really needed? sking, November 5 @ 9:55 PM (1/1)
- Support for .one FranR, November 5 @ 3:29 AM (1/1)
- Group One Registry SHOULD be supported mouradz, November 3 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)
- me too! mika, November 3 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
- .one strickt, November 3 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)
- Good Proposal catief, November 3 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)
- Support for .one - simple and beneficial rguptill, November 3 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- I support .one jwilson, November 2 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
- Support for (.one) KD, November 2 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)
- Aesbus supports.one jenjen281, November 1 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
- Support for .one bakedon, November 1 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- The Internet needs .one! Havener, November 1 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
- Support for Group One registry (.one) jonsholberg, November 1 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)
- .one cumbow, October 31 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
- .one TLD is a very sound proposal smuller, October 31 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
- Correlation between .one address and phone numbers msedmundw, October 30 @ 11:46 PM (1/1)
- Public safety and .one sellmhi, October 30 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
- Visual Computing Systems supports .one roykess, October 29 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)
- Shockwave Wireless Support for Group One's Registry Proposal thirou, October 28 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
- .One domain. Amin_Ansari, October 27 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
- Go with group one Registry Inc's Proposal hubbard4536, October 27 @ 7:50 AM (0/0)
- Support for Group One Registry Garrettsmith, October 27 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
- The .one TLD lbayles, October 27 @ 2:54 AM (1/1)
- .one rajamedlink, October 26 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)
- Fort Knox / WebVision Relationship cdodder, October 24 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- jGuru supports .one tombu, October 23 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
- .one application by Group One Registry ggoeser, October 22 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- Application posted at www.grouponeregistry.com PKS, October 17 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy