Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: allens
Date/Time: Mon, November 13, 2000 at 10:07 PM GMT (Mon, November 13, 2000 at 5:07 PM EST)
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.7 using XWindows/IRIX64 6.4
Score: 5
Subject: .kids: Scrap.

Message:
 

 
I would like to suggest that the .kids proposals (and
similar content-limited proposals such as .xxx) be scrapped. As well
as international disagreements over content (many Islamic countries
would deem much material freely available in the US unsuitable for
adults, let alone for children, for instance), there are many
disagreements within countries over classifications - even if one
believes any such should be done, which I do not. Much material that
some parents (e.g., fundamentalists) believe their children should not
receive is the exact material that others (such as myself) believe is
exactly what they _should_ receive; a primary example is sex
education. Moreover, attempts to exclude "hate speech" are inevietably
biased toward dominant cultures, insofar as speech against minority
portions of those cultures is not labelled "hate speech" but the
reverse is not true. I point to the labelling of the pentagram (an
ancient pagan symbol) by many schools as "satanic" or a "gang symbol"
as one primary example of this. Moreover, religious (or
anti-religious) prostletization is inevietably a form of speech
against those who do not hold the same views as the author - and it
inevietably becomes "hate speech" given the emotions involved.

Ultimately, I do not believe that children's access to information should be censored. How, precisely, are children supposed to learn the ever-more-important skill of sorting through information, without having as wide a variety of information as they desire to distinguish between? If the information is pre-selected (particularly pre-selected on non-objective criteria, as the proposal seeks to do),
they cannot learn this skill from it - and, as the Internet grows,
this skill becomes more and more important.

-Allen
     
     
     
     

 

Link: Peacefire


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy