Re: [gnso-osc] CCT Report II

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

>From Mason's note, I accept that the issue was discussed and not ignored.  And 
>while I still disagree with including it, do not wish to stop the document 
>from going forward based on its inclusion.  

I agree with the change being offered.

On the issue: 

>>  Ive not yet heard an advocate for the right to be unpleasant. 

I would like to add that it is, however, a right of which most of us have all 
availed ourselves at one point or another.  so while I continue to believe that 
civility is a valued virtue and we should all endeavor to learn civility and 
teach it by example, we must also remember that sometime unpleasantness happens 
and sometime it is within ones right, or even responsibility, to do things that 
other might consider unpleasant and uncivil.

Finally this thread indicates the value of submitting reports back with revised 
documents, indicating the manner by which every comment was dealt with, thus 
allowing those who comment to avoid the feelings of having been ignored and the 
frustration that comes with those feelings.

Thanks

a.

On 19 Mar 2010, at 09:30, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> Mason,
>  
> wrt Report II section 4.9
> I too struggle to understand the basis of the objection to section 4.9 as Ive 
> not yet heard an advocate for the right to be unpleasant. However, may I 
> suggest a simple compromise.
> -----------------------
> DELETE
> As reflected in the following ICANN Board Resolutions, the CCT encourages 
> ICANN, Staff, and the GNSO to remind participants frequently of its standards 
> for behavior:
>  
> ADD
> This issue has been fully addressed by the Board:
> --------------------------
>  
> Philip
> OSC Chair
>  
>  
>