Re: [soac-mapo] On "universal resolvability" and useful questions that emerged yesterday

[Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anthony,

2010/8/31 Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> If it's ambiguous in one part of the world, then it's ambiguous, by
> definition.   This should be a very high bar.   Who could judge it?  A
> three-part process consisting of a quick look, a panel, and the Board.
>
> three-part process is a good formulation. Basically, this is what the DAG
contains already (more or less). Just need to fill the criteria.

maybe an element that is missing is appeal mechanisms.

B.





>
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Le 31 août 2010 à 17:35, Antony Van Couvering a écrit :
> >
> >> -- Is the meaning of the string unambiguous (there are no other innocent
> uses for it)?
> >
> > Anthony, who could judge that? I can think of several words that might
> seem unambiguous in one part of the world but not in another...
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
>
>


-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")