RE: [alac] RE: Archiving comments received? (Proposal.)

["Denise Michel" <denisemichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The draft criteria/process/guuideliness for public comment should have
contained the "forum" email address, rather than the "alac-comments" email
address.  I will correct that.  Additionally, I will contact the few people
who have sent comments on this and invite them to re-send their comments to
the "forum" address to be publicly posted.  The "forum" public archive has
been operational -- this list just hasn't been used yet.

Denise

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vittorio Bertola [mailto:vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 1:17 AM
>To: Denise Michel
>Cc: alac@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [alac] RE: Archiving comments received? (Proposal.)
>
>
>On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:20:45 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>As noted on our website, comments sent to <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>are public.
>>When people start sending emails to this address they will be publicly
>>archived. (It seems this needs to be clarified/highlighted on the
>website??)
>
>No, but then we have to advertise this address, rather than the other
>one, when we ask for public comment on drafts. It's fine to have a
>separate contact address for private enquiries, but public comment
>should be archived publicly and automatically as it arrives, as it
>already happens usually in ICANN.
>
>I have been asked publicly to answer where public comments on this
>draft are being archived, so please let me know whether the public
>archival on the forum address is actually working now, or when it will
>be. Also please forward comments received by the -comments address to
>this list, as you are doing now - this way we will ensure they are
>archived.
>--
>vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
>-------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------