Re: [alac] Selecting Our Successors
Without going to details, I see this a little bit simlar to what happened to AP RALO formation discussion. On the one hand, we wanted to go fast and establish initial RALO, without waiting many ALSs to aplly and join, then based on this RALO, we could further expand and enrich the organization. On the other hand, we wanted to make sure we have enough "representation" or at least out reach so that we will not miss those potential players to become real and active players. The problem was that the minimal criteria for RALO was in a sense so low, more than three ALSs from more than two contries, it is hard to determine what is the appropriate level to form a RALO. I have no clear answer (yet). And I also see this ALS - RALO - ALAC is a complex layered system, better to simplfy. But as some of us said, changing the rule of the game while at play is not the best way. Though sometimes, some games/sports change their rules, within their own legitimate process and procedures, of course. If you look at how FIFA changed the "offside" rule, you can still see some confusion and experimentation ;-) Sorry, nothing definitive, but that's what we are facing, and at one point we have to decide in onw way or another. thanks, izumi
|