ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] Selecting Our Successors

  • To: hongxue@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [alac] Selecting Our Successors
  • From: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:51:14 +0100



hongxue@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

experience shows, that if you establish an organisation with its own charter/by-laws, it is hard to change it even if the model prooves not to work. There is something like a certain organisational tenaciousness - and of cause the fact, that there are people elected on this bases for two years contributes to a certain persistance.
People who want to get involved with internet consumer issues in ICANN do not want to put their energy in changing the rules of an organisation first, before they can start to work.



Fully agree! That's exactly the reason that I insisted on carefully scrutinizing the draft of APRALO chapters. As a result, the majority voting proposal was dropped off and replaced by "consensus" model at Vancouver Meeting. Of course, once consensus is reached, any action (including voting) can be taken thereafter.

Hong



The building up of a RALO is a big chance to do outreach and get other people and organizations involved in the work on internet consumer issues within ICANN.

We should define a time until when this organisation is going to be structured and build.

Now, as we do have a proposal for the organisational structure of a RALO, it should be publicly discussed within a reasonable period of time.

For this purpose we should actively invite those organisations and individuals who might be interested in this work to take part in that discussion of structure, aims and priciples of the RALO. They need a clear deadline until when decisions have to be taken and for setting this deadline, the fact has to be taken into account, that organisations which are democratically structured, need a certain time for their intern decision making process.

There are many organisations and individual which have not been adressed to join the At-Large and could take part in the process now.

We would give away a big chance of getting involved more folks in our work, if we first fix structures which cannot be changed for several years (and may only be attractive for the few already involved, but not for the participation of new comers) and than start outreach work.

Annette



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy