RE: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

The draft should be posted shortly, the request has been sent to the web 
masters.

As soon as the link is available it will be distributed and added to the 
appropriate documents.

Thanks 
Glen

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: mardi 1 juin 2010 15:22
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; William Drake; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry
Cc: cgreer@xxxxxxxxx; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
Importance: High

Thanks to everyone who worked so cooperatively on this.  As soon as I receive 
the final draft from Bill I will send it to Olof and Janis so that the call of 
candidates may be posted with reference to our proposed procedures.

Glen - Could you quickly get the draft posted once it is received so that a 
link could be provided in the Call for Candidates?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:08 AM
> To: William Drake; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; cgreer@xxxxxxxxx; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-
> arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> 
> Yes, I'm ok with it.
> 
> Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:19:44
> To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>;
> <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> 
> Ok I've heard from everyone who's been active in this discussion except
> for Tim.  Time are you ok with the doc, can I send it and the motion to
> council?
> 
> BD
> 
> 
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:58 AM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > I'm fine, too. Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Wolf-Ulrich
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Mai 2010 14:49
> > An: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; Caroline Greer; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx;
> William Drake
> > Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Betreff: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> >
> >
> > Me too.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:19 AM
> >> To: Caroline Greer; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; William Drake;
> Gomes,
> >> Chuck
> >> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> >>
> >> Fine with me too.
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: "Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:19:51
> >> To: William Drake<william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Gomes,
> >> Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> >>
> >>
> >> I am fine with that qualifications paragraph Bill.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Caroline.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of William Drake
> >> Sent: 28 May 2010 10:11
> >> To: Gomes, Chuck
> >> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> >> Importance: High
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding
> >> opening the call for AoC RT applicants.  As soon as we have our
> draft
> >> process, I would like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects.
> >> Can
> >> we finalize the proposed process not later than tomorrow so that
> Bill
> >> may send it to the Council list by then?  If so, then I will send it
> > as
> >> a draft to Marco & Janis.
> >>
> >> Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent
> >> process seems to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on
> the
> >> latter.  To finalize we need clarification from selectors et al on
> the
> >> expected regular RT time cycles so contracted folk can decide how
> long
> >> they can have after the calls close, bearing in mind the potentially
> >> three week wait after that to the next council call.  When you reach
> >> closure we'll plug in the number.
> >>
> >> Also was this suggestion on the qualifications ok with people
> >>
> >>> 7. A two to three paragraph statement about the applicant's
> > knowledge
> >>> of the GNSO community and its structure and operations, and any
> >> details
> >>> of his/her participation therein or, in the event that an applicant
> >> has not been involved in the GNSO community,
> >>> a two to three paragraph statement attesting to knowledge of the
> >> substantive issues for which the GNSO is responsible.
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> ***********************************************************
>