<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-consensus-wg] Nom Comm appointee roles
- To: <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Nom Comm appointee roles
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:35:31 +0200
Lets move this argument away from personalities.
For me the logic gap in the concept of nomcom appointees is the following.
The new commercial users group is intended to outreach and present a compromise
position of
the diverse views of the globe's commercial users.
The new non-commercial users group is intended to outreach and present a
compromise position
of the diverse views of the globe's non-commercial users.
Just what perspective is left for NomCom delegates?
By what logic are three votes more relevant than a process that outreaches and
presents a
compromise position of the diverse views of the globe's users?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|