[gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept

[philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]

This is only the case assuming nom com.
Without there has to be buy-in all round.
A tie break chair's vote could break deadlock.
------------------------

 Whereas I think that Jon's proposal has potential and support further
> investigation, I want to point out the following: If only a simple
> majority of each house is needed to approve a consensus policy then, as
> Jon's example below illustrates, be possible for a consensus policy to
> be approved without any support of two stakeholder groups, one in each
> house.  I don't think that would be consensus.  What about requiring 60%
> for consensus and a higher threshold for supermajority?
>
> Chuck