<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
- From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:32:12 +0200 (CEST)
>
> Philip,
>
> To what are you referring when you say 'veto re bindig policy'? I have
> consistently been opposed to any one SG being able to veto an action,
> including a binding policy.
>
Ps: I thought the formulation for supermajority binding policy provided a
veto.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|