Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] 1st draft - Advice Letter Submission Supplement

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Fine by me

*Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  **(CLO)*
 http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr



On 1 August 2012 06:06, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>   Thanks for this draft, Berry.
>
>  I recommend we re-phrase 3rd sentence, from this:
>
> If adopted by the future Affirmation review team, this advice could be
> critical to measuring the success of the new gTLD program
>
>
>  To this:
>
> If adopted by the Board, these metrics could be valuable to the future
> Affirmation review team charged with evaluating the gTLD expansion program.
>
>   I also have a question about the timeline chart:  why do we show the
> Affirmation Review Team starting its review at the same time that new
> delegations begin?    I understand that the dashed line implies that we'll
> probably start nominating reviewers several months before the Review
> begins.    But the AoC says, "If and when new gTLDs have been in operation
> for one year," so we ought to stick with that.
>
>  --
> Steve DelBianco
>
>
>   From: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:07 PM
> To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] 1st draft - Advice Letter Submission
> Supplement
>
>   Team,****
>
> ** **
>
> Here is the first draft for advising the Council about Next Steps and a
> possible path forward.  I welcome “messaging” tailoring.  Given the latest
> announcement about the single batch, I adjusted the graphical timeline.  We
> can review this tomorrow after we sprint forward with the Public Comments.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you.  B****
>
> ** **
>
> Berry Cobb****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)****
>
> 720.839.5735****
>
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx****
>
> @berrycobb****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>