Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm

[Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Following up to myself here.

Maria has produced a draft report, but I am just getting a chance to
review it.  As a result, it probably won't make it to the list until
late today, which leaves hardly any time to review it prior to a
potential call tomorrow.

I am going to propose, therefore, that we review and vote on the
report by e-mail instead of on a teleconference.  In the past, we have
had to collect votes by e-mail after calls, so there is actually
little reason to do the vote on a call.

In order to keep us running on schedule, I'd like to propose that we
work any revisions to the report over the coming weeks, and aim to
complete revisions and voting by January 6, at which point I hope
we'll be ready to post the report for public comment.

Using this approach, there would be no conference call tomorrow.

Jordyn

On 12/9/05, Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There's a question I can answer.
>
> I think the next step for us is to prepare a preliminary report on the
> topic of the purpose of Whois.  This report will likely include both
> of the definitions of purpose presented in Vancouver, along with an
> indication of which constituencies/reps support each.
>
> I believe that the only question raised in Vancouver was wether in
> addition to the contact information for one or more problem solves,
> some sort of information that clearly ties the domain to the
> registrant should be included.  I'd be interested to hear TF members'
> views on this.
>
> With that as the only outstanding issue, I think we can ask Maria to
> at least start putting together the framework of a preliminary report
> that will present both of the definitions.  Once that is done, we can
> vote and indicate our support for the two approaches.  Then the report
> can be published for public comment and we can see if there is further
> feedback there that may help resolve the apparent impasse.
>
> I suggest that we have our next call on December 20 (which I realize
> is quite close to Christmas), and that we ask Maria to distribute an
> initial draft of a report by December 16 (next Friday) so that we can
> begin to consider in on that call.
>
> Jordyn
>
> On 12/9/05, Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As interesting as this discourse as, can someone fill me in on next
> > steps for this working group? It wasn't quite clear coming out of VCR
> > (at least not to me)...
>