<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:31:33 -0400
hi,
it all depends.
.museu (Catalan) might be confusing, but
whether
.musée (French),
מוזיאון (Hebrew - really a transliteration) or
박물관 or 기념관 or 미술관 or 자료관 (variations in Korean provided by Google translate)
are, is more difficult to answer.
As I said before, I think these are matters for extended evaluation. Though,
it does not seem that there is extended evaluation for failing the string
similarity test. But I may be wrong as I have not studied DAGv3 with an
applicant's eye yet.
I also think it is fine to open up a policy discussion on this issue because i
do agree that we know a lot more now about how complicated it can become then
we knew back then (and it is a mighty interesting topic). But, if we open it
up for discussion, I think we need to open up the entire kettle of fish for
inspection and that may introduce dreaded delay.
I also think it is fine to leave this alone for round 1, see how the mechanism
works and use the second round as a way to fix things (the council's intent if
i remember correctly) and allow those who want multiple
strings-that-fail-similarity-but-are-under-the-same-registry to apply for them
in batches.
a.
On 14 Apr 2010, at 17:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Avri,
>
> Let me ask my question in a different way.
>
> If MuseDoma applied for an IDN version of .museum, it seems to me that
> it is possible that it could be disallowed because it could be
> confusingly similar to the existing .museum gTLD. I definitely do not
> think that was the intent of the GNSO recommendation. Similarly, if a
> new gTLD applicant applied for an LDH gTLD and an IDN version of that
> same LDH gTLD, I believe that the IDN version should not be disallowed
> because of the confusingly similar restriction (recommendation 2).
>
> Do you agree with my reasoning on the above?
>
> Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|