<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:35:20 -0400
But 'confusing similarity' is not restricted to only visual confusion in
the GNSO recommendations.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:04 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
>
>
>
> On 16 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
>
> > It seems unnecessary and against the original intention.
>
> and as long as 'confusing similarity' means 'likely to cause
> visual confusion,' it won't happen and there will be no
> problem as was intended by the council.
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|