| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the councilFrom: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:35:20 -0400 
 
But 'confusing similarity' is not restricted to only visual confusion in
the GNSO recommendations.
Chuck 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:04 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> 
> On 16 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
> 
> > It seems unnecessary and against the original intention.
> 
> and as long as 'confusing similarity'  means 'likely to cause 
> visual confusion,' it won't happen and there will be no 
> problem as was intended by the council.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |