<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: AW: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group
- To: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:17:37 -0500
I would think that this is already mandatory as
part of the rationale that the Board includes for
all motions. It would be outrageous to have a
rationale and not make reference to a relatively
unusual situation of advice, and particularly a
PDP recommendation not being followed.
Alan
At 29/11/2012 03:30 AM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:
Should the Board be obliged to explain to the
public when it ignores a "GNSO advice"?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|