Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group

[Paul Diaz <pdiaz@xxxxxxx>]

+1 ...unless they redact the advice that drove the rationale

PAUL DIAZ
Director of Policy
.ORG, The Public Interest Registry
Main: +1 703 889-5778  | Direct: +1 703 889-5756  | Mobile: +1 703 973-1667 | 
Skype: pdiazaim | Fax: +1 703 889-5779 |

Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org>  |  .ORG 
Blog<http://blog.pir.org/> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | 
YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> |

On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:


I would think that this is already mandatory as
part of the rationale that the Board includes for
all motions. It would be outrageous to have a
rationale and not make reference to a relatively
unusual situation of advice, and particularly a
PDP recommendation not being followed.

Alan

At 29/11/2012 03:30 AM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:

Should the Board be obliged to explain to the
public when it ignores a "GNSO advice"?