<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - DOODLE Poll for IGO-INGO Calls
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - DOODLE Poll for IGO-INGO Calls
- From: kenstubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:34:38 -0500
I too have the same conflicts as does, i believe, david maher
Ken stubbs
"Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Berry,
>
>I completed the poll for 5 December but it is important to note that my
>availability on that specific date should not be assumed to be the same
>on every Wednesday because the RySG has regular biweekly meetings on
>Wednesdays; it just so happens that 5 December is in between RySG
>calls.
>
>Chuck
>
>From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:18 PM
>To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - DOODLE Poll for IGO-INGO
>Calls
>Importance: High
>
>Team,
>
>Please complete the following Doodle poll for Staff to determine if a
>more accommodating meeting time can be scheduled. At present, the next
>IGO-INGO call is scheduled for 5 DEC 2012 @ 19:00 UTC.
>
>
>http://www.doodle.com/73b4zxhx6ffcee5g
>
>Only if we receive a majority response to the Doodle by the end of week
>and if it depicts a different time counter to our regular schedule will
>we adjust the schedule for the 5 DEC session. So in the meantime,
>assume that the meeting will occur at 19:00 UTC.
>
>Thank you. B
>
>Berry Cobb
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>720.839.5735
>mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>@berrycobb
--
Sent from my Android tablet.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|