<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call
- To: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:57:09 +0000
David Maher and I will do our best to provide detailed input before the meeting.
Chuck
From: Kiran Malancharuvil [mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:48 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Scheduling the next WG call
I don't think it's a good idea to eliminate the possibility of participation by
an entire SG and one of the organizations that we're discussing.
Looks like there's a lot of support for 17:30 and a shorter call.
Brian/Berry/Thomas/Julia/Someone/Anyone, can we finalize??
K
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]>
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:15 PM
To: Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call
A third option would be to go with the earlier time frame that a lot of people
seemed okay with and those of us who have a conflict can provide input in
advance and afterwards. So far it looks like just Jim, David and I cannot make
the earlier time.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Peck
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:05 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
As Chuck has mentioned, there is a new gTLD webinar scheduled for 16:00 - 17:30
UTC next Wednesday, 5 June which conflicts with our scheduled WG call (16:00 -
18:00), and the RySG meeting takes place the prior two hours which makes it
difficult to move our meeting earlier. Moving the meeting back a couple of
hours makes it late for our colleagues in Europe time zones, while moving the
meeting to another day would also be difficult to coordinate given different WG
meetings and everyone's other commitments.
Given the situation, we'd like to narrow the options to two choices:
1. Keep the currently scheduled time at 16:00 UTC (if a minimal number of WG
members are planning to attend the webinar);
2. Start the meeting one hour later (17:00 - 19:00 UTC) which would result
in just a 30 minute conflict with the webinar (from 17:00 - 17:30).
Please indicate if you have a preference, thanks.
Best Regards,
Brian
Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|