ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call

  • To: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:57:09 +0000

David Maher and I will do our best to provide detailed input before the meeting.

Chuck

From: Kiran Malancharuvil [mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:48 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Scheduling the next WG call

I don't think it's a good idea to eliminate the possibility of participation by 
an entire SG and one of the organizations that we're discussing.

Looks like there's a lot of support for 17:30 and a shorter call.  
Brian/Berry/Thomas/Julia/Someone/Anyone, can we finalize??

K

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:15 PM
To: Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Scheduling the next WG call

A third option would be to go with the earlier time frame that a lot of people 
seemed okay with and those of us who have a conflict can provide input in 
advance and afterwards.  So far it looks like just Jim, David and I cannot make 
the earlier time.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Peck
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:05 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call

As Chuck has mentioned, there is a new gTLD webinar scheduled for 16:00 - 17:30 
UTC next Wednesday, 5 June which conflicts with our scheduled WG call (16:00 - 
18:00), and the RySG meeting takes place the prior two hours which makes it 
difficult to move our meeting earlier. Moving the meeting back a couple of 
hours makes it late for our colleagues in Europe time zones, while moving the 
meeting to another day would also be difficult to coordinate given different WG 
meetings and everyone's other commitments.

Given the situation, we'd like to narrow the options to two choices:

  1.  Keep the currently scheduled time at 16:00 UTC (if a minimal number of WG 
members are planning to attend the webinar);
  2.  Start the meeting one hour later (17:00 - 19:00 UTC) which would result 
in just a 30 minute conflict with the webinar (from 17:00 - 17:30).
Please indicate if you have a preference, thanks.

Best Regards,

Brian

Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy