RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Latest Work Products for IGO-INGO Consensus Call

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Regarding Claudia's 5th comment on General Recommendation 4, I think the result 
is the same whether we change the wording as Claudia suggested and call it 
consensus or leave the wording as is and call it divergence.  I personally 
think I am fine with the changes she made.

Chuck

From: Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT [mailto:MACMASTER@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 8:18 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Fournet Guilaine (gnf@xxxxxx)
Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Latest Work Products for IGO-INGO Consensus Call

Hi Thomas, and colleagues,

Comprehensive indeed. We can agree with most of your suggestions.

We have a only a few comments, and attach them here.

Hi Berry,

Please let us know if you would like us to update the ISO-IEC Minority 
Statement we sent in August to reflect new dates and titles.

Thank you again,
Claudia (ISO)

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 2013-09-13 01:53
To: Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Latest Work Products for IGO-INGO Consensus Call
Importance: High

I did what I think was a fairly comprehensive review of the main body of the 
draft final report and made quite a few edits (mostly minor I think) and 
inserted some comments and questions.  It was a cumbersome and tedious job so I 
would appreciate it if a few people would check the edits I proposed and 
validate them or correct them.

One big change I suggested was to reorder the sections by putting the 
recommendations earlier in the main body of the report so that readers see them 
sooner and to not have to first wade through lengthy Background and 
Deliberation sections first.  I did not make that change in the document 
because it would have probably created confusion with the redlining.  My 
rationale for suggesting the reordering is stated in comments at the beginning 
of Sections 3, 4 & 5.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:06 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Latest Work Products for IGO-INGO Consensus Call
Importance: High

WG Members,

Please find attached the latest versions of the documents for the Consensus 
Call as we prepare to release the draft Final Report for Public Comment next 
week.  A few notes about the attached documents:

1.       IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v1.3 - contains the compilation of 
responses from groups and individual for the first round of the consensus call. 
 As of today, this does not include the RrSG and the CBUC support statements, 
but we anticipate them to be sent shortly.  As I get each official statement, I 
will send out a revised version of this document.

2.       IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.1 - This version of the report contains all 
the tracked-changes as it migrated from Initial to draft Final.  There are far 
too many changes for this to be a useful tool, and thus all changes were 
accepted in v0.2, but I included it for your reference.

3.       IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.3 - This version includes all changes that 
were accepted in v0.2 and it includes tracked changes that were made as a 
result of today's call.  This version has the latest consensus levels, but note 
that it does not include Minority View statements.

Please provide any feedback or suggested changes within the v0.3 version of the 
report (track changes are enabled).  Also as a reminder, for those groups that 
anticipate including a Minority View position statement, please send those 
along to the list and I will incorporate them into the master version of 
Section 5.

DUE DATE:  All suggest edits, changes, and Minority View statements must be 
submitted to the list by 17 September 2013 @ 22:00 UTC (note, I extended this 
by 6 hours to give groups a bit more time.)

As stated on the call, we will review the final version of the report in next 
week's call, and with the WG's permission submit the report for Public Comment 
on 19 September 2013.  We will discuss in detail this round of the public 
comment forum in addition to any discussions we have about the policy 
recommendations.

Thank you for everyone's participation today.  Happy reading!  :)

B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb