<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] IOCR discussion group - MP3, attendance 26 September 2012
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'avri@xxxxxxx'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] IOCR discussion group - MP3, attendance 26 September 2012
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:08:04 -0400
The recording will be authoritative, but I
believe that Wolfgang said he was speaking on
behalf of the NCUC not NCSG. I do recall him
using the word "constituency" and think that he
said NCUC but not 100% sure. He did lead off
saying their (whoever the they was) was similar
to the one that I gave on behalf of the ALAC,
that it supported the compromise, but that the
decision was not unanimous and the ALAC would
have FAR preferred that the RC and IOC had been
divided into to different recommendations.
Alan
At 27/09/2012 07:30 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
Avri,
We are going to open up a public comment period
on everything that has been received by COB
today (wherever you are in the world)...just so
Berry and ICANN has it when they come into the
office in the morning Friday, that said,
Wolfgang was on from the NCSG yesterday, but did
not express opposition to the moratorium. I
thought, and we can check the recording, that he
said the NCSG supported the recommendations. I
could be off base, and Berry was taking notes so he can correct me.
In either case, that opinion is not set in
stone, but it is important as it sounded like on
the call the was indeed a consensus on all of
the recommendations (if just a rough
consensus). So, if you could confirm the NCSG position that would be great.
Thanks.
Sent with Good (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 02:31 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] IOCR
discussion group - MP3, attendance 26 September 2012
I unfortunately could not attend the meeting.
I want to make it clear that I do not support a
the moratorium, but do support the PDP
I also believe that this is the position of the NCSG.
I hope that this is what was conveyed by the lone NCSG participant.
What is the deadline for opposing statements?
Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear all,
Please find the MP3 recording
of the GAC/GNSO issues related to International
Olympic Committee (IOC) and Red Cross (RC)
names discussion group teleconference held on
Wednesday 26 September 2012 at 1800 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-gac-ioc-20120926-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#sep
The recordings and transcriptions of
the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/>
Attendees
Jeff Neuman - Registry SG group leader
Wolfgang Kleinwachter NCUC
Lanre Ajayi - Nominating Committee Appointee
Alan Greenberg ALAC
Chuck Gomes - RySG
Kiran Malancharuvil IPC
David Heasley - IPC
Jim Bikoff IPC
Stéphane Hankins
International Committee of the Red Cross
Thomas Rickert - Nominating Committee Appointee
Osvaldo Novao -ISPC
Apology :
Avri Doria NCSG
J.Scott Evans IPC
Gregory Shatan IPC
Mary Wong - NCUC
Brian Peck
ICANN Staff
Margie Milam
Berry Cobb
Nathalie Peregrine
** Please let me know if your
name has been left off the list **
The mailing list address is
Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx%3cmailto:Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx> >
Public archives are at:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-iocrc-dt/
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie
GNSO Secretariat
gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
Avri Doria
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|