RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

That can explain the Danish/Norwegian and Japanese being missing from 
the AG. It does not address whether we are protecting 4 or 8 strings 
in Arabic, and if 4, which 4.
Alan

At 08/11/2012 11:49 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> I think what you will hear is that when the Board created the list, 
> they did so based on letters that they received from the IOC prior 
> to the Singapore meeting.  Although the IOC and RCRC indicated that 
> the lists were illustrative and were not the complete lists, ICANN 
> limited the list to what had been previously submitted.  Between the 
> Singapore resolution and September 14th, 2011 (when the GAC released 
> its proposal), the IOC and RCRC consulted with the GAC to provide a 
> more comprehensive list.  That more comprehensive list was not 
> incorporated into the Guidebook, but was in fact included in the GAC proposal.
> Hope that helps explain the differences.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"
>
>
> Thanks Alan.  I think it would be helpful to find out from ICANN 
> staff why the AG varies from the GAC request.
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-
> > dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 11:30 PM
> > To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"
> >
> >
> > During the meetingtoday, the issue came up whether we should be using
> > the list published in the AG, or in the September 2011 GAC letter to
> > the GNSO.
> >
> > I did a quick review of them.
> >
> > Red Cross: The GAC list includes Danish/Norwegian and Japanese that
> > are not in the AG.
> >
> > IOC: The lists are almost identical, except to my untrained eye (as
> > well as Google Translate), the Arabic version in the two documents
> > seem quite different.
> >
> > Alan