Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Krista.
Please note that Mary is not a member of this working team, but she was so
kind to send this  proposed language.
In this sense I want to ask Rafik if he can pass this question to Mary.
I wish you all a happy Easter!
Regards
Olga

2010/4/1 Papac, Krista <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  I would like to hear Mary’s thoughts, but am also curious to hear from
> other members on this WT that belong to {GROUPS}.
>
>
>
> Krista Papac
> Iron Mountain Digital
> 5530 Bandini Blvd
> Bell, CA  90201  US
> Home Office: +1.714.846.8780
> Mobile: +1.714.865.7655
> Fax: +1.323.443.3573
> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> *“Software Escrow for Dummies”** - order your complimentary copy t*oday at
> <http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
> www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
>
>
>
> *New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
> Negotiation*
>
> Gartner advises: “It is also important that the licensee continue to track
> the software vendor’s financials and viability annually, because any signs
> of financial problems would justify the cost of verification services.”
> Continue reading the full report at:
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:52 PM
> *To:* Papac, Krista; Rafik Dammak; Julie Hedlund
>
> *Cc:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
>
>
>
> Perhaps Mary would like to address this question in the first instance.
>
>
>
> Failing that I would be happy to respond by reference to the BGC’s Report
> and recommendations and ICANN’s public trust function and role and by
> reference to the other relevant organizations we looked at where in the key
> examples all lists and all groups are open.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
>
> Principal
>
> McEvedys
>
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys *
>
> [image: cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC]
>
>
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
>
> London
>
> W2 5PL
>
>
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
>
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
>
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
>
> * *
>
> *www.mcevedy.eu  ***
>
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
>
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
>
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
>
> *From:* Papac, Krista [mailto:Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* 31 March 2010 14:32
> *To:* Victoria McEvedy; Rafik Dammak; Julie Hedlund
> *Cc:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
>
>
>
> Team,
>
>
>
> Can someone explain to me why {GROUPs} would want to open their Policy
> Committee Meetings to the public?
>
>
>
> Krista Papac
> Iron Mountain Digital
> 5530 Bandini Blvd**
> Bell**, CA**  90201**  US**
> Home Office: +1.714.846.8780
> Mobile**: +1.714.865.7655
> Fax: +1.323.443.3573
> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> *“Software Escrow for Dummies”** - order your complimentary copy t*oday at
> www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
>
>
>
> *New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
> Negotiation*
>
> Gartner advises: “It is also important that the licensee continue to track
> the software vendor’s financials and viability annually, because any signs
> of financial problems would justify the cost of verification services.”
> Continue reading the full report at:
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Victoria McEvedy
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:02 AM
> *To:* Rafik Dammak; Julie Hedlund
> *Cc:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
>
>
>
> I think Mary’s suggestions are excellent and I support either version. My
> view is these committees ---where all the crucial work of the Groups is done
> –most definitely need transparency, term limits and openness, real rotation
> of members and leaders as well as disclosure of work and work product –at
> least within the Group.  This is not currently happening in some Groups and
> goes to the very heart of all reforms.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
>
> Principal
>
> McEvedys
>
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys *
>
> [image: cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC]
>
>
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
>
> London
>
> W2 5PL
>
>
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
>
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
>
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
>
> * *
>
> *www.mcevedy.eu  ***
>
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
>
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
>
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* 30 March 2010 02:48
> *To:* Julie Hedlund
> *Cc:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Mary sent her suggestions and there are two alternative:
>
>
>
> #1: "Policy Committee meetings shall be open for attendance by all {GROUP}
> members, and, subject to any express provisions otherwise in a {GROUP}
> Charter, shall also be open for attendance by the public."
>
>
>
> #2: "Policy Committee meetings shall be open for attendance by all {GROUP}
> members, and, subject only to the conditions specified in this Section 8(b),
> shall also be open for attendance by the public. These conditions are either
> that (i) the {GROUP} Charter expressly restricts attendance at a particular
> type of Policy Committee meeting; or (ii) the Policy Committee decides, in
> its reasonable discretion, that the nature of a particular Policy Committee
> meeting is such that attendance should be limited only to {GROUP} members.
> Provided that, in the case of condition (ii), the Policy Committee
> shall inform all {GROUP} members of its decision to restrict attendance at
> the meeting as soon as practicable and in any case prior to the commencement
> of the meeting, and it shall further use reasonable efforts to make public
> any decisions taken at that meeting as soon as possible thereafter."
>
>
> Regards
>
> Rafik
>
> 2010/3/27 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting and posted on the wiki
> at: *https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team
> *..  Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.  Our next
> meeting will be held *Friday, 09 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for
> one hour.*   Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *Action Items*:
> *1. Task 1, Subtask 2: (See the wiki at: **
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2
> *. )
> *A) CHANGES THROUGH SECTION 8:*
>
>    - *Work Team members should review all changes through Section 8.
>    Policy and provide comments to the list not later than Friday, 01 April. It
>    will be assumed that all changes are agreed to if no comments are received.
>    *
>    - *Rafik Dammak* agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had suggestions for
>    alternative language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b. "Committee 
> meetings
>    should be open for attendance by all {GROUP} members –- and at the election
>    of the Constituency -- to the public.”
>    - *Krista Papac* agreed to review Claudio DiGangi's suggested language
>    (added to the wiki) to Section 4. Voting as it also could be applied to
>    Section 1. Executive Committees to maintain consistency.
>
> *B) REMAINING SECTIONS:* *Work Team members should review the remaining
> sections of Task 1, Subtask 2 and send comments to the list: *
>
>    - *9. GNSO WG; *
>    - *10. Reference to Code of Practice at Annex B (and Annex B text); *
>    - *11. Reference to Handbook on Common Rules and Principles;   *
>    - *12. Reference to recommendations applying to Contracted House
>    Stakeholder Groups; and *
>    - *Part IV: Analysis*
>
>
> *2. Task 1, Subtask 3: Julie will load the latest version from Krista on
> the wiki.* Work Team members are requested to review the document in
> preparation for the meeting on Friday, 09 April.
>
> *3. Task 2: Outreach:* *Debbie Hughes will provide some ideas to begin the
> discussion on the Sub Team. *The Sub Team members are: Debbie (leader),
> Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and Michael Young.
>
> *Summary:*
>
>    - Olga noted that Philip Sheppard, the new Chair of the Operations
>    Steering Committee, has requested that the Work Team complete its work by 
> 01
>    June in preparation for the ICANN meeting in Brussels. Olga explained to
>    Philip that the Work Team might not be able to complete Task 2, but would
>    complete the remaining subtasks of Task 1. She recommended that the Work
>    Team should finish Task 1, Subtask 2 by the next meeting and begin a review
>    of Task 1, Subtask 3, and asked Krista to send the latest version for Julie
>    to load on the wiki.
>    - The Work Team discussed additional changes to Section 1. Elections
>    and Section 4. Voting. Claudio provided revised language to the list for
>    consideration. Krista agreed to review Section 1. Elections in view of
>    Claudio's revised language.
>    - The Work Team agreed to retain the previous changes in Section 5.
>    Voting. Rafik agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had suggestions for 
> alternative
>    language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b. "Committee meetings should be
>    open for attendance by all Constituency {GROUP} members –- and at the
>    election of the Constituency -- to the public."
>    - On Task 2, Olga asked for volunteers for a Task Sub Team. Debbie
>    Hughes agreed to be the leader of the Sub Team and the other volunteers
>    were: Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and Michael
>    Young.
>    -
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4983 (20100329) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4987 (20100331) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4987 (20100331) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>  ------------------------------
>
> *The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
> intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email, you
> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
> must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
> original message. *
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4987 (20100331) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4990 (20100401) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> * The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
> intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email, you
> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
> must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
> original message. *
>