Re: [gnso-raa-b] RE: RAA: topics in category #9: RAA termination

[Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steve
Just a suggestion, but isn't this also part of the compliance  
discussion - i.e., what happens after registrar non compliance?

On 31/12/2009, at 8:14 AM, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> _
> RAA subteam B participants:
>
> As discussed on our most recent call, in order to move our work  
> forward, it was recommended that we launch discussion of some of  
> the remaining categories in the compiled list of RAA amendment  
> topics.  (I am using the revised chart, posted earlier today and  
> dated today, December 30.)
> According to my notes, we have discussed topics 1-4 in our previous  
> call. On topic 5 -- compliance -- I have, by a message posted  
> earlier today, asked staff to provide their views on our next call  
> on Tuesday, Jan. 5.  I have just posted messages regarding topics  
> 6, 7 and 8.
> Here are some views put forward to get the discussion started on  
> topic #9,  recognizing that our role at this stage is primarily to  
> organize and prioritize the topics proposed, rather than to delve  
> too deeply into the details of the proposals made.  (This does not  
> preclude us from deciding, if we can, that one or another topic is  
> simply out of scope or not appropriate for consideration with  
> regard to RAA amendments.)
> Re:  Topics in category #9
> Most of the items in this category deal with the circumstances  
> under which ICANN has the right to terminate an agreement with a  
> registrar (9.1 and 9.2) and the procedures for doing so (9.3).  All  
> of these, I suggest, should be considered as higher priority items.
> Item 9.4 may depend on the status of the Draft Registrar  
> Disqualification Procedure.  Can staff provide any insights on this?
> Reactions on the list, please?
> Steve Metalitz
Kind regards

Holly Raiche
Executive Director,
Internet Society of Australia (ISOC-AU)
ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mob: 0412 688 544
Ph: (02) 9436 2149

The Internet is For Everyone