Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Naming the Houses

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Assuming the Board/SIC has no objection to Houses choosing their own
name, will it be possible to find a name that is acceptable to both SGs
in that house?

a.


On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 14:11 +0200, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> There are two primary objections to "Non-contracting parties House"
>  
> a) The world outside ICANN
> We are often too intro-spective when we discuss ICANN issues.
> For me, as someone involved for most of my time in non-ICANN issues I
> frequently explain to senior policy makers and CEOs what ICANN is
> about.
> Using language to describe a group such as "Users" communicates to
> these people.
> "Non-contracting" requires a detailed understanding of ICANN.
>  
> b) Self-esteem
> As professionals engaged in a political and economic process we do not
> wish to be known for what we are NOT.
> We wish to be known for what we are.
>  
>  
>  
>