Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5 diversity by-law

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

As the conversation on this has come to a lull and somewhat of an  
impasse, I would like to suggest some phrasing that I hope helps in  
reaching consensus on this important point.  In reading the messages,  
some of the important themes I picked up were:
- there should be parity between the requirements on the SGs
- geographical diversity is necessary but difficult and may sometime  
require exceptions
- other forms of diversity including but not limited to sector and  
skill set are also important, but harder to define in a manner that is  
appropriate for by-laws.
Building on a suggestion made by Jon, I suggest the following for  
discussion:
Stakeholder Groups should ensure their representation on the GNSO  
Council is as diverse as possible, including but not limited to  
geographical region, sector and in terms of skill set.  In order to  
insure geographical diversity, no more then 1/3 of a single  
Stakeholder groups representatives to the Council can come from any  
single ICANN defined geographic region;  any exception to this  
requirement must be approved by a 2/3 vote of both houses.  In terms  
of other forms of diversity, SG rules and procedures as well as  
outreach programs must be put into place to insure maximum possible  
diversity in all areas.

thanks

a.