RE: [gnso-rn-wg] RN-WG Questions: Report detail: DISPUTES AND OBJECTIONS

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

Why are you opposed to asking the GAC if it is okay to include their
draft guidelines in our report?

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 12:29 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Marilyn Cade; GNSO RN WG
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] RN-WG Questions: Report detail: 
> DISPUTES AND OBJECTIONS
> 
> hi,
> 
> On 12 mar 2007, at 11.58, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > The documents portion of the site is password protected, 
> which tells 
> > me that the guidelines are not public.
> >
> 
> but we are not talking about drafts they may or may not have 
> in a document section we cannot see.  we are talking about 
> what can be seen and commented on by anyone on the Internet 
> who uses google.
> 
> and i, or anyone else, can still pull the document from:
> 
> http://gac.icann.org/web/meetings/mtg26/
> gTLDs_principles_on_public_policy_draft_17_oct_2006.doc
> 
> 
> which tells me it is meant to be public.
> 
> 
> 
> a.
>