<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:23:56 +0200
You make a good point and I was asking myself the same question. We can work on
a long-term solution, but I frankly don't see any way of coming up with one for
this short term need.
I was thinking I should go back to the VI co-chairs and tell them that there's
really nothing that can be done at such short notice.
Do people agree with that approach?
Stéphane
Le 25 mai 2010 à 18:18, Avri Doria a écrit :
>
>
> On 25 May 2010, at 09:16, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
>> But I think the important point here is: can the Council as a whole step in
>> and donate a slot in cases such as these, and would that be a fair and
>> practical way of dealing with issues such as this one?
>
>
> Something like:
>
> Every SG will donate N (orN/2 depending on the number of slots available to
> the SG) travel slots a year for emergency needs such as getting a WG chair to
> a meeting? And if this is what the team decides I will take it back to the
> NCSG with my personal support (yes and including the recommendation that we
> would do our fair share)
>
> But who would go first to solve the issue this time? Obviously sometimes the
> person is a member of a particular SG group so hopefully they can do this.
> But sometime she or he won't be.
>
> Otherwise, are there any suggestions on the way to solve this since mine
> seems so very shot down.
>
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|