<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:17:58 +0100
Thanks Chuck.
Stéphane
Le 8 févr. 2010 à 00:00, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> Please go ahead and assume the coordinator role Stephane. If anyone objects
> going forward, we can back up a step. In the meantime, I think it is more
> important to keep things moving. It may be that the coordinator role is not
> terribly needed considering the great discussion going on, but I feel more
> comfortable if someone has that responsibility if it is needed.
>
> Chuck
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:51 PM
>> To: Gomes, Chuck
>> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
>>
>> Thanks Chuck,
>>
>> I will await your confirmation before assuming an
>> coordination role for this DT.
>>
>> Until then, my contributions are all made as RrSG councillor
>> unless otherwise stated as personal.
>>
>> I would suggest to the group that, should Chuck confirm me as
>> coordinator, I then only act in that capacity in order to
>> avoid any misunderstandings. There are 2 other RrSG reps on
>> this group so the registrar view will undoubtedly be well
>> represented. Should I at any point wish to make my personal
>> views known, I will make sure they are clearly represented as such.
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>> Le 7 févr. 2010 à 15:34, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
>>
>>> Thanks Stephane.
>>>
>>> Having seen no other volunteers or nominations or
>> objections, I suggest that Stephane serve as the coordinator
>> for this DT. If anyone objects, do so by providing an
>> alternative. Otherwise, he will serve as coordinator and
>> will function neutrally in that capacity, being careful to
>> distinguish between his role as coordinator and RrSG
>> Councilor or individual.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:47 PM
>>>> To: Gomes, Chuck
>>>> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
>>>>
>>>> It seems my answer to this email did not reach the full
>> list, so just
>>>> to make sure everyone knows that I agreed to be
>> coordinator if that
>>>> can help the group.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Stéphane
>>>>
>>>> Le 5 févr. 2010 à 13:28, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephane,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you be willing to do this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:25 AM
>>>>>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4 Feb 2010, at 09:30, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Likewise with a chair, isn't it the WG that needs a chair?
>>>>>>>> DTs need chair's too?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chuck: I believe it is helpful to have leadership in most
>>>>>> efforts. I
>>>>>>> don't care what we call it. Who is going to keep the ball
>>>>>> rolling if
>>>>>>> we do not identify a person or persons to assume that
>>>>>> responsibility?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> on something as short lived as I hope this DT is, I
>> would like to
>>>>>> suggest that a council member, perhaps the chair of
>>>> v-chair, be the
>>>>>> one to coordinate our efforts with the assistance of the Margie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i 'nominate' Stephane.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once it comes time to start the WG, I recommend that whoever
>>>>>> coordinates the DT effort, or the Council liaison, be the one to
>>>>>> initiate the WG until such time as the group selects a
>>>> chair, whose
>>>>>> selection will need to be reviewed by the council.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|