RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Please go ahead and assume the coordinator role Stephane.  If anyone objects 
going forward, we can back up a step. In the meantime, I think it is more 
important to keep things moving.  It may be that the coordinator role is not 
terribly needed considering the great discussion going on, but I feel more 
comfortable if someone has that responsibility if it is needed.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:51 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
> 
> Thanks Chuck,
> 
> I will await your confirmation before assuming an 
> coordination role for this DT.
> 
> Until then, my contributions are all made as RrSG councillor 
> unless otherwise stated as personal.
> 
> I would suggest to the group that, should Chuck confirm me as 
> coordinator, I then only act in that capacity in order to 
> avoid any misunderstandings. There are 2 other RrSG reps on 
> this group so the registrar view will undoubtedly be well 
> represented. Should I at any point wish to make my personal 
> views known, I will make sure they are clearly represented as such.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 7 févr. 2010 à 15:34, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> 
> > Thanks Stephane.
> > 
> > Having seen no other volunteers or nominations or 
> objections, I suggest that Stephane serve as the coordinator 
> for this DT.  If anyone objects, do so by providing an 
> alternative.  Otherwise, he will serve as coordinator and 
> will function neutrally in that capacity, being careful to 
> distinguish between his role as coordinator and RrSG 
> Councilor or individual.
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:47 PM
> >> To: Gomes, Chuck
> >> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
> >> 
> >> It seems my answer to this email did not reach the full 
> list, so just 
> >> to make sure everyone knows that I agreed to be 
> coordinator if that 
> >> can help the group.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> 
> >> Stéphane
> >> 
> >> Le 5 févr. 2010 à 13:28, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Stephane,
> >>> 
> >>> Would you be willing to do this?
> >>> 
> >>> Chuck
> >>> 
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
> >>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:25 AM
> >>>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> hi,
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 4 Feb 2010, at 09:30, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Likewise with a chair, isn't it the WG that needs a chair? 
> >>>>>> DTs need chair's too? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Chuck: I believe it is helpful to have leadership in most
> >>>> efforts.  I
> >>>>> don't care what we call it.  Who is going to keep the ball
> >>>> rolling if
> >>>>> we do not identify a person or persons to assume that
> >>>> responsibility?
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> on something as short lived as I hope this DT is, I 
> would like to 
> >>>> suggest that a council member, perhaps the chair of
> >> v-chair, be the
> >>>> one to coordinate our efforts with the assistance of the Margie.
> >>>> 
> >>>> i 'nominate' Stephane.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Once it comes time to start the WG, I recommend that whoever 
> >>>> coordinates the DT effort, or the Council liaison, be the one to 
> >>>> initiate the WG until such time as the group selects a
> >> chair, whose
> >>>> selection will need to be reviewed by the council.
> >>>> 
> >>>> a.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 
>