Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Zero Cross-Ownership (0CO) as an option for the group

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I totally agree.
If we can reach rough consensus on something better then 0CO, 
yipeee!

a.

On 7 Apr 2010, at 14:58, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

> 
> I agree that zero cross ownership is an option and so is 100% cross ownership 
> and many others that fit in the middle. We are just in the beginning of 
> trying to decide as a group what that result could be. 
> Yes, the Board decision is the default position, there is no doubt there, I 
> am not even sure why that is a debate. 
> 
> 
> What is surprising to me is what I am hearing on this WG from people who have 
> been involved in ICANN for so long and who are the big believers in the 
> bottom up consensus policy process.  If my issue is not addressed then we end 
> this WG, pack up and go home. Or that in the first 2 weeks of the WG I have 
> not heard or see the benefits of cross-ownership, so we should forget about 
> cross ownership.
> 
> We have still not heard everyone's proposals or even let this working group 
> start working. May I suggest we give people some breathing room and give them 
> a chance to gather their thoughts and work together before we decide what our 
> result should be. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>