Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant issue

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks.  I apologize for not having understand your previous message 
to this effect.

a.



On 14 Apr 2010, at 07:46, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Avri:
> 
>> I have been clear about thinking that this issue is not 
>> precluded from our charter.  And I believe that many other 
>> people have followed a similar line of reasoning no matter 
>> what their specific view on the subject.
>> 
>> But if someone is going to keep making what I believe is a 
>> disruptive claim that something is out of scope, we better 
>> deal with that issue.  Basically the chairs need to let us or 
>> CORE know so that we do not need to be continually  the 
>> recipients of a backhanded reprimand from CORE on this issue.
> 
> I thought I have expressed my thoughts in a sufficiently clear way, so
> unless my co-chair has a different view we will accept discussion points
> related to SR, as well as points that are orthogonal to it.
> 
> I am sure that SR is not the only subject that one or more WG members would
> not like to see discussed. My take is that, while there is no obligation to
> contribute for who does not want to, there is no reason for stopping the
> others from discussing it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Roberto
> 
>