ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Competition authorities

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Competition authorities
  • From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:18:45 -0700

Avri,

What would happen if the two national competition authorities made differing 
judgments?

RT


On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> 
> On 20 Apr 2010, at 18:17, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> That said,  I don't know what would stop an applicant from incorporating in 
>>> a jurisdiction where competition 
>>> authorities are known to be extremely liberal, or non-existent.  
>> 
>> Which is what anyone who wanted to "game" a system would do.
>> 
> 
> 
> One of the thoughts that I had on that was that since ICANN is incorporated 
> in the US, the US competition authorities would always end up  being 
> consulted as well as any local ones.  
> 
> a.
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy