ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Competition authorities

  • To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Competition authorities
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:16:26 -0400

There are 53 political jurisdictions in Africa. Assuming that the
prerequisite number consent to one or more applications for .africa,
to which is reference to a competition authority made, under a
reference to competition authority model?

Why would reference not be made to the competition authorities of
jurisdictions which did not approve one or more applications?

If the answer includes reference to the United States and its
competition authority, are there circumstances where reference is made
to two or more competition authorities, neither of which is the United
States competition authority?

Turning to the two or more applications, forming a contention set of
size two or more, presenting two or more distinct competition models,
and two or more competition authorities, should reference to two or
more competition authorities occur before resolution of the string
contention set, simultaneously, or after?

If the answer is "after", as the string contention process is by
design indifferent to any properties of an application other than
whether the application is made as a community-based type of
application, then information from all but one of the possible
references to competition authorities on the models present in the
contention set is, by design, not available for evaluation.

As a proposed change to the entire evaluation process, which design
change is proposed? A change that adds some steps before completion of
the string evaluation, or a change that does not use information
concerning competition authorities?

What changes to the model offered by dotAsia applicant for ".asia"
would, if made in the eventual new gTLD round, cause reference to one
or more competition authorities to be necessary under the reference to
competition authority model, and to which competition authorities?

Note: The .asia application was made with indications of support from
the following, none of which are competition authorities:

MONIC - Macau Network Information Center (.MO)
CNNIC - China Internet Network Information Center (.CN)
TWNIC - Taiwan Network Information Center (.TW)
IUSN - Internet Users Society - Niue (.NU)
VNNIC- Vietnam Internet Network Information Center (.VN)
JPRS - Japan Registry Service Co., Ltd. (.JP)
ccTLD-ID - Country Code Top Level Domain Indonesia (.ID)
APNIC - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre
APNG - Asia Pacific Networking Group
Hong Kong Information Technology Industry Council (HKITIC)
Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC)
Web Commerce Communications Limited (ICANN-Accredited Registrar from
Malaysia)
IP Mirror Private Limited (SGNIC-Accredited Registrar from Singapore)
Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association (HKISPA)
Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited (CYBERPORT)
Hong Kong Information Technology Federation (HKITF)
Information and Software Industry Association, Hong Kong (ISIA)
Hong Kong Telecommunications Users Group (HKTUG)
Hon SIN Chung-Kai, Legislative Councillor, HKSAR
Invest Hong Kong, HKSAR Government (InvestHK)

The full .asia application may be found here:
http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/asia.htm

Eric



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy