Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi Eric,

i'm of the same view as Roberto (as always).  i read your proposal, and 
followed up with you off list to get an explanation.  you referred me to the 
original RFC that established the shared registry system (an RFC co-authored by 
Roberto) in lieu of an explanation.  so i went and found the RFC and still 
don't understand your proposal.  if Roberto is having trouble understanding it 
too, i think we need to defer until you can explain it better on the list.  

so i would like to defer your slot on a plenary call until the working group 
has gotten through the short-term work that's in front of us, and you've come 
up with a proposal that at least Roberto can understand the relevance to the 
work we're doing.  you don't have to dumb it down to my level, although that 
would be helpful too.

thanks,

mikey


On May 15, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Can please somebody on this list translate this into a sentence that can be
> understood by somebody who has only basic level of English like me?
> I have tried hard to understand what Eric wants to discuss, but failed so
> far.
> I don't want to leave the burden of the decision to my colleague co-chair
> alone, but I can't include something in the agenda unless I understand what
> that is. This in particular considering that there is a substantial effort
> going on to complete Kathy's matrix, and it seems to me that there's where
> the attention should be concentrated.
> Thanks,
> Roberto
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric 
>> Brunner-Williams
>> Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 01:10
>> To: Mike O'Connor
>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items
>> 
>> 
>> Mike,
>> 
>> You are, as co-chair, seeking to avoid allocating time to 
>> discussing a proposal to reduce vertical integration of 
>> registry service providers and registry operators, for 
>> existing registries, as well as for registries arising out of 
>> applications for the standard type, and the community-based 
>> type, so that you may allocate that scare resource to 
>> discussing an imaginary application type, on equal standing 
>> as existing application types.
>> 
>> Either allocate some time to the subject or don't, but let me 
>> know no later than 24 hours prior to the call time.
>> 
>> Eric

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)