Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

I think Eric is referring to his proposal that there must be 2 or more 
competitively selected back-end providers for each TLD.  

Though this is an interesting idea,  I don't think its in the charter of our 
group as it's not a cross ownership issue.  

RT

 
On May 15, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> hi Eric,
> 
> i'm of the same view as Roberto (as always).  i read your proposal, and 
> followed up with you off list to get an explanation.  you referred me to the 
> original RFC that established the shared registry system (an RFC co-authored 
> by Roberto) in lieu of an explanation.  so i went and found the RFC and still 
> don't understand your proposal.  if Roberto is having trouble understanding 
> it too, i think we need to defer until you can explain it better on the list. 
>  
> 
> so i would like to defer your slot on a plenary call until the working group 
> has gotten through the short-term work that's in front of us, and you've come 
> up with a proposal that at least Roberto can understand the relevance to the 
> work we're doing.  you don't have to dumb it down to my level, although that 
> would be helpful too.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On May 15, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> 
>> Can please somebody on this list translate this into a sentence that can be
>> understood by somebody who has only basic level of English like me?
>> I have tried hard to understand what Eric wants to discuss, but failed so
>> far.
>> I don't want to leave the burden of the decision to my colleague co-chair
>> alone, but I can't include something in the agenda unless I understand what
>> that is. This in particular considering that there is a substantial effort
>> going on to complete Kathy's matrix, and it seems to me that there's where
>> the attention should be concentrated.
>> Thanks,
>> Roberto
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric 
>>> Brunner-Williams
>>> Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 01:10
>>> To: Mike O'Connor
>>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mike,
>>> 
>>> You are, as co-chair, seeking to avoid allocating time to 
>>> discussing a proposal to reduce vertical integration of 
>>> registry service providers and registry operators, for 
>>> existing registries, as well as for registries arising out of 
>>> applications for the standard type, and the community-based 
>>> type, so that you may allocate that scare resource to 
>>> discussing an imaginary application type, on equal standing 
>>> as existing application types.
>>> 
>>> Either allocate some time to the subject or don't, but let me 
>>> know no later than 24 hours prior to the call time.
>>> 
>>> Eric
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
>