RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I am sorry I cannot agree with Jeff Neuman here. Granted that Mike's questions 
were a bit one sided I think it legitimate to ask - and will ask myself if 
necessary - how many prospective applicants are out there who would find our 
proposed entry restrictions onerous. 

--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:24 AM
> To: Richard Tindal; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I do not see these questions as being helpful in us achieving consensus.
> I think questions more tailored to the proposals we have created that
> have the most support would be more beneficial than an open debate
> repeating the Seoul debacle.
> 
> Possibly questions regarding enforcement, compliance, etc. would be more
> helpful and more appropriate for the particular audience.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
> have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately and delete the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Tindal
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:14 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> 
> 
> I think also in the Financial Services Industry, in many countries
> 
> RT
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> >
> > Mike,
> > There are several in the telecommunications industry.
> > For example, depending on local regulations, some companies are not
> allowed to give triple play services and must do this throug other
> distribution channels.
> > Regards
> > Olga
> >
> > Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:48:58
> > To: 'Milton L Mueller'<mueller@xxxxxxx>; 'Mike
> O'Connor'<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>; <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-to: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> >
> >
> > How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, have
> restrictions on
> > cross ownership and vertical integration?
> >
> > How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, are forced to
> > distribute their primary product through a third party distribution
> network?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Rodenbaugh
> > RODENBAUGH LAW
> > tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> > http://rodenbaugh.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:36 PM
> > To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> we've got an opportunity to frame a few questions for the public
> forum -
> >> - topics we'd like to get testimony on, so to speak.
> >>
> >> so my question to you all is...
> >>
> >> what topics would you like to hear from people about?
> >>
> >
> > How many prospective registry operators want to be able to sell
> direct?
> > - especially interested in NON-US, NON-EUROPEAN IDN applicants
> > How many registrars are considering entering the registry business and
> would
> > be negatively affected by ownership limitations?
> > How many smaller cultural, community or linguistic TLD applicants are
> > worried about carriage by registrars?
> > How many registrars are already making behind-the-scenes deals with
> > registries to feature their TLDs?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>