RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

I do not see these questions as being helpful in us achieving consensus.  I 
think questions more tailored to the proposals we have created that have the 
most support would be more beneficial than an open debate repeating the Seoul 
debacle. 

Possibly questions regarding enforcement, compliance, etc. would be more 
helpful and more appropriate for the particular audience.

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Richard Tindal
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:14 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum


I think also in the Financial Services Industry, in many countries

RT


On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> Mike,
> There are several in the telecommunications industry.
> For example, depending on local regulations, some companies are not allowed 
> to give triple play services and must do this throug other distribution 
> channels.
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:48:58 
> To: 'Milton L Mueller'<mueller@xxxxxxx>; 'Mike O'Connor'<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
> <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-to: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> 
> 
> How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, have restrictions on
> cross ownership and vertical integration?  
> 
> How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, are forced to
> distribute their primary product through a third party distribution network?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:36 PM
> To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> we've got an opportunity to frame a few questions for the public forum -
>> - topics we'd like to get testimony on, so to speak.
>> 
>> so my question to you all is...
>> 
>> what topics would you like to hear from people about?
>> 
> 
> How many prospective registry operators want to be able to sell direct?
> - especially interested in NON-US, NON-EUROPEAN IDN applicants
> How many registrars are considering entering the registry business and would
> be negatively affected by ownership limitations?
> How many smaller cultural, community or linguistic TLD applicants are
> worried about carriage by registrars? 
> How many registrars are already making behind-the-scenes deals with
> registries to feature their TLDs? 
> 
> 
> 
>