Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

As a 50% cross-owner of the Seoul debacle, I endorse Jeff's comments

RT



On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> All,
> 
> I do not see these questions as being helpful in us achieving consensus.  I 
> think questions more tailored to the proposals we have created that have the 
> most support would be more beneficial than an open debate repeating the Seoul 
> debacle. 
> 
> Possibly questions regarding enforcement, compliance, etc. would be more 
> helpful and more appropriate for the particular audience.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Richard Tindal
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:14 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
> 
> 
> I think also in the Financial Services Industry, in many countries
> 
> RT
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Mike,
>> There are several in the telecommunications industry.
>> For example, depending on local regulations, some companies are not allowed 
>> to give triple play services and must do this throug other distribution 
>> channels.
>> Regards
>> Olga
>> 
>> Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:48:58 
>> To: 'Milton L Mueller'<mueller@xxxxxxx>; 'Mike O'Connor'<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
>> <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reply-to: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
>> 
>> 
>> How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, have restrictions on
>> cross ownership and vertical integration?  
>> 
>> How many businesses, other than gTLD registries today, are forced to
>> distribute their primary product through a third party distribution network?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mike Rodenbaugh
>> RODENBAUGH LAW
>> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
>> http://rodenbaugh.com 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:36 PM
>> To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] questions for the public forum
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> 
>>> we've got an opportunity to frame a few questions for the public forum -
>>> - topics we'd like to get testimony on, so to speak.
>>> 
>>> so my question to you all is...
>>> 
>>> what topics would you like to hear from people about?
>>> 
>> 
>> How many prospective registry operators want to be able to sell direct?
>> - especially interested in NON-US, NON-EUROPEAN IDN applicants
>> How many registrars are considering entering the registry business and would
>> be negatively affected by ownership limitations?
>> How many smaller cultural, community or linguistic TLD applicants are
>> worried about carriage by registrars? 
>> How many registrars are already making behind-the-scenes deals with
>> registries to feature their TLDs? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>