<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] the "it excludes some applicants" argument
- To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] the "it excludes some applicants" argument
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:12:38 -0700
Alan, I disagree. PDP '06 was specifically devoted to contractual
conditions. The domain tasting PDP changed contractual conditions. The
WHOIS PDP will eventually change contractual conditions. My memory may be a
little hazy, but I thought this Vertical Integration group is a PDP Working
Group, or at least a "pre-PDP" working group. Even those advocates of the
status quo have agreed at least that there should be more study in a
later/ongoing PDP.
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:56 PM
To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Milton L Mueller'; 'Jeff Eckhaus';
Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] the "it excludes some applicants" argument
At 07/07/2010 01:25 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
And in any event, any such harms, if serious enough, can be addressed
through a later PDP.
Just one comment since similar things have been said by a number of people.
We are talking about contractual conditions here. No PDP, regardless of the
level of GNSO support or Board support, has the power to alter those.
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|