Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Ps.

I am not asking to be on this Sub Team.  but will it follow the practice of 
sort of using the main list for its discussions?

I would prefer to be on the next one dealing with the compliance effort in 
order to deal with Harms, assuming such a sub team is created at the 
appropriate point in time.

a.

On 28 Jul 2010, at 07:48, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> 
> On 28 Jul 2010, at 03:06, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> 
>> Let's prioritize for harms that are dangerous AND most likely to occur.  
> 
> I think after the Harms Sub Team lists all of the possible harms, setting 
> these two values may be a good use for another of Mikey's polls were we each 
> rate the degree of harm (H)  and the likelihood of  the harm occurring (L) on 
> a 5 point scale.
> 
> then to arrive at the ranking factor =  H * L
> 
> and then averaging and showing range for each defined harm.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>