Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:48:29 +0200
On 28 Jul 2010, at 03:06, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> Let's prioritize for harms that are dangerous AND most likely to occur.
I think after the Harms Sub Team lists all of the possible harms, setting these
two values may be a good use for another of Mikey's polls were we each rate the
degree of harm (H) and the likelihood of the harm occurring (L) on a 5 point
then to arrive at the ranking factor = H * L
and then averaging and showing range for each defined harm.