<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- To: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:34:49 -0700
There is no evidence that mankind ever lived in trees.
On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Volker Greimann wrote:
>
> Hi all
>> In one sense you are right. No one ever knows what the future holds. So
>> maybe we should just quit where we are ahead and say, gee no idea.
> With that kind of reasoning, mankind would never have left the trees. There
> is always "unknown unkowns", but with proper planning, foresight and
> appropriate analysis, it is usually possible to contain the unknown dangers
> of living on the ground/outside caves/in a world with VI and CO.
>
>> But in another sense this is a normal risk analysis process in the face of
>> unknowns.
> +1
>> And indeed what we are talking about in terms of harms is risk analysis.
>> And no analysis of the future of a system I know of, avoids risk analysis
>> because there are unknowns.
> Exactly. Lets put the harms on the table, discuss them, look at them and try
> to build general principles from them that will be able to deal with those
> harms specifically, but unknown harms as well. Civilization was built with
> the idea that there can be rules regulating human behaviour and discouraging
> abusive behavior.
>
> Let us try to bring the rule of law to the world of new gTLDs instead of
> fearing the dragons that lurk near the edge of the world.
>
> Best,
>
> Volker
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|