<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:38:15 -0700
The difference is that in the MaPO group there was little or no self-interest.
No-one had any investment in the old proposal and (apparently) no-one is keen
to apply for a "sensitive" name. So we could all just go to work on the
merits.
Contrast and compare.
Antony
On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> i'm really curious how the MaPO group got that matrix of theirs pulled
> together. i know there's a lot of overlap between our two groups. can
> somebody who was in that group chime in with a quick summary of what the
> sequence of events was? i'm hoping that might show us a way forward.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|