ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-wpm-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:39:47 -0300

Thanks Ken.
Perhaps we can prepare  shorter version for GNSO and a more detailed one for
wrap up and special WPM meeting.
What about including the list of projects  we have agreed today and the
results of the excercise we did among the group as examples of the ongoing
work? That would go in the longer version...
Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.
Regards
Olga

2010/3/1 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Thanks Ken.  Nice job.
>
> Is this for possible use in the Council meeting on 10 March?  If so, note
> that there are only 20 minutes allocated for this agenda item and that
> includes Council & Community discussion.  We can discuss this in our call
> tomorrow, but in my preliminary opinion we would only have time for the
> following slides in this meeting: 1-5 and 9-11.
>
> The topic is on the agenda for the Wrap-Up meeting on the 11th and there
> may be a little more time in that meeting if Councilors would like to get
> more info.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Ken Bour
> *Sent:* Monday, March 01, 2010 4:34 PM
> *To:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council
> Meeting
>
>  WPM Team Members:
>
>
>
> At the team’s request, I have prepared the attached PowerPoint slide deck
> for your review.
>
>
>
> My overall objectives were:
>
> 1)      Review/remind Councilors why this WPM was undertaken, i.e. its
> mission/purpose
>
> ·         Referencing the Staff GNSO Participation and Attendance study
> and its conclusions
>
> 2)      Show the critical thinking and planning that went into the team’s
> initial work plan structure – all of November
>
> ·         The team had to invent its own model conceptualizations and
> rationale
>
> ·         Iterative six step internal validation process
>
> 3)      Explain how the time has been utilized
>
> ·         Graphed the 6 step process since December to show the team’s
> progress
>
> ·         Most steps have taken < a month and the trajectory has been
> steadily upward/forward
>
> ·         As with any complex iterative process, it became necessary,
> through testing/learning, to revisit earlier decisions
>
> ·         Team mindful of saving the entire Council those machinations
>
> 4)      Highlight team decisions made
>
> 5)      Outline remaining action items and decisions yet to be completed
> (I guessed at March-April)
>
> 6)      Q&A
>
>
>
> I presume that tomorrow’s call will largely be taken up with going through
> this slide deck to make sure that these are the points we want to make.
>
>
>
> Once we finalize the content, I will also make a PDF so that it can be
> uploaded to Adobe Connect in Nairobi.
>
>
>
> Olga – I haven’t included any speaker notes yet, but I am willing to write
> some after our call tomorrow.   I wanted first to see if the team generally
> approves of the approach taken and content.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy